<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Web 2.0 Miller Lite Battle: Great Utility! Useful Data!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://learntoduck.com/business/web-2.0-miller-lite.utility.data/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://learntoduck.com/business/web-2.0-miller-lite.utility.data</link>
	<description>sometimes it takes getting punched in the face</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:48:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Micah</title>
		<link>http://learntoduck.com/business/web-2.0-miller-lite.utility.data/comment-page-1#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learntoduck.com/?p=164#comment-826</guid>
		<description>its just easier to use the terminology that is currently being thrown around. Plus its shorter than &quot;Michael Gruen is an Ass point oh.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its just easier to use the terminology that is currently being thrown around. Plus its shorter than &#8220;Michael Gruen is an Ass point oh.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gruen</title>
		<link>http://learntoduck.com/business/web-2.0-miller-lite.utility.data/comment-page-1#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>Gruen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learntoduck.com/?p=164#comment-825</guid>
		<description>Alright-- let&#039;s find a new moniker for web technologies. This iterative &quot;Web 3.0&quot; crap has got to go.

Let&#039;s coin a new term or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright&#8211; let&#8217;s find a new moniker for web technologies. This iterative &#8220;Web 3.0&#8243; crap has got to go.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s coin a new term or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu Andrews</title>
		<link>http://learntoduck.com/business/web-2.0-miller-lite.utility.data/comment-page-1#comment-823</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learntoduck.com/?p=164#comment-823</guid>
		<description>Seriously cool post Micah. Been thinking about this, but you have coalesced this idea very nicely. 

My gut feeling says the Hallmark is Utility. The data is always there, in some form. It&#039;s our tools to better utilise or form or manipulate that data which, to me, mark the new wave of web development.

Although, saying that, I think about the fact that smart people throughout the ages are always able to build good utilities for retrieving/manipulating data.

Taking this into account, the Hallmark of Web 2.0 is both. Twitter and Friendfeed are both Hallmarks. 

Man, too much thinking. Need to clarify more. Cool post Micah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously cool post Micah. Been thinking about this, but you have coalesced this idea very nicely. </p>
<p>My gut feeling says the Hallmark is Utility. The data is always there, in some form. It&#8217;s our tools to better utilise or form or manipulate that data which, to me, mark the new wave of web development.</p>
<p>Although, saying that, I think about the fact that smart people throughout the ages are always able to build good utilities for retrieving/manipulating data.</p>
<p>Taking this into account, the Hallmark of Web 2.0 is both. Twitter and Friendfeed are both Hallmarks. </p>
<p>Man, too much thinking. Need to clarify more. Cool post Micah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
