untitled.

A couple of months ago, I was lucky enough to participate in WordCamp Denver. The night before, there was a speakers/VIP dinner, which was awesome because so many of my friends where there.

Among the crew was Ben Huh of Pet Holdings (they run the ICanHasCheezburger network) and Matt Mullenweg of Automattic (they run WordPress). The three of us got to talking about post titles (of all things).

Ben talked about how he had a team of moderators whose job it was to read and curate all the submissions to the various Pet Holdings sites. He expressed the difficulty that exists with matching posts to each other because of the unique language used to title and tag everything.

Matt talked about how they measured the importance of the title of posts in increasing readership, and how they noticed that some people were really masters at writing titles. Matt mentioned that the title was something he left to the end (as do most bloggers), and it was something that he felt that he could improve on.

For me, I explained that I love writing titles and that often I dont write the post until the title forms in my brain. That for me, the post is driven by the title, rather than the opposite.

As the weeks past, this conversation continued to replay itself in my brain.

“Why are titles so important?”

When I did SEO full-time, I spent a lot of time building title tags for clients. The title on the page became the clickable link within the search results that (hopefully) was interesting enough for the searcher to click on and drive meaningful traffic to the client’s site.

I had a newspaper client. We used to talk a lot about how newspapers, by definition, were always a day late with news. Therefore the headlines would assume that you already knew what was going on.

Instead of: “Challenger Space Shuttle Explodes to the Horror of Many”

You would get: “Tragedy in the Sky”

Which works better for blog posts?

I am no journalist. I rarely write about events (apparently you can get sick if you kiss a pig?) current or otherwise. My titles should be interesting enough, that people are open to reading the rest of the post. My titles are the marquee. The post is the drinks served inside. (Comments are when someone decides to buy me a drink…I could on forever with this analogy…)

For me, titles are the most fun part of writing, and the most important. Since I dont have a “big” name and people dont read my posts simply because I wrote them, my titles need to be compelling enough to draw readers in.

Here are my three rules of title writing:

1) Is the first word I utter after reading a title: “interesting”? Then its a good title.

2) Would I conclude my post with the title? Then its a good title.

3) Am I disappointed in the post after reading the title? Then the title sucks.

I tend to keep titles to 5-7 words max. I tend to use mixed case. I tend to not care about the SEO of the title. I tend to change my title as the post grows.

There has to be more than that, right? Why do people fret so much over the titles that they write?

For most people, they spend a lot of time writing and researching their posts. A bad title could reduce readership significantly, while a great title could drive readership through the roof.

After all, the game of blog writing is engaging your readers. If you cant engage them by the titles of the posts you write, then most likely, your posts will also be less engaging.

Here is another tip: If you saw your title in the middle of 10 other similar titles (say on a Lijit or Google SERP), would you click on it?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

3 Rules of Gnomedex 8.0

Yesterday morning, I got home from Gnomedex 8.0 and after 24 hours, I have finally been able to distill the conference. It was my first time attending Gnomedex, but not the first time hearing about it.

In 2000, I worked at a startup in San Francisco Bay Area. One of the developers suggested I check out a website called Lockergnome (really an email list), run by some dude named Chris Pirillo, because they had a lot of interesting Windows 95/98 stuff. He was really excited for Chris’ conference called Gnomedex.

“What’s with the gnomes?” I thought to myself. “Must be some developer thing.”

Fast forward to 2008. Im working at Lijit. My friend Jeremy Wright of b5media asks if I am going to Gnomedex. Aaron Brazell laments that he wont be able to make Gnomedex this year. Tara Anderson tells me about how Gnomedex last year was so successful for the company.

So I went.

Thank God I did.

Of the three, Gnomedex was the smallest. Which, of course, made it easier to talk to folks. But, where the difference was most evident was in the sessions themselves. Here is the main reason why Gnomedex was amazing:

There was, literally, no hallway conversation. Everyone was in the sessions.

So, my three rules of Gnomedex:

1) Prepare to feel dumb.

The dude who drives the Mars Rover spoke. Some guy spoke on Cyborgs. Someone else spoke on voice controlled joysticks.

Right.

But, none of the attendees made me feel stupid. Some would even sit with me and explain what was said on stage, and to be clear it wasnt all that heady. Ben Huh, presentation about the growth of Pet Holdings, Inc was amazing and funny. It was great to see someone apply real science to the concept of memes.

2) Prepare to be real.

The attendees’ bullshit meter is uncanny. Attendees walked out of sessions, confronted speakers, questioned presentation points. The rule of being real was in serious effect.

3) Prepare to be amazed.

Amazed by the speakers? sure. The attendees? sure. But mostly, the calmness of the proceedings. Everyone was there to enjoy themselves, interact and learn. Some learned more than others. Some interacted more. But, everyone was almost…well, as cliche as it is, familial. Chris’ wife and parents helped with the conference. There is a real respect and love for Chris that was evident in the room. And, more than any other conference I have attended, a real respect for each other.

Nice work Chris and Ponzi. But more so, nice work Gnomedex community. See you in ’09!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Dammit Jim, Im a Doctor Not A Miracle Worker!

Dr. Leonard “Bones” McCoy, from Star Trek, when faced with an apparent impossible task, would exclaim, “Dammit Jim, Im a doctor not a miracle worker!”

Success often breeds difficulties that young entreprenuers never foresee.

At Current Wisdom, our success was greatly accelerated. With yearly growth in the hundreds of percent, we found that success created logistical realities that we were ill equipped to deal with.

Hire a CPA? Whats that? I have QuickBooks, isnt that enough?

A Lawyer? For what? We wrote our own contracts?

HR? Are you kidding? We can hire and fire how ever we want.

Early success creates heightened expectations.

When you begin, as a company or a person, to really make hay, you begin to create a promise to your boss, your board, your colleagues, that you arent a one hit wonder.

So how do you avoid it?

You cant. Early success is always an indication that you have the ability to create long term success.

Read that again. If you can do it once, you can do it twice.

Its just harder the second time around.

So, here are my three rules for sustained success:

1) Realize that success doesnt fall out of the sky because you have a cool app or you are the best marketer ever. Success exists because multiple people do stuff in concert. You cant brute force or use your force of will to create success. You much create a foundation that success can build on.

2) For success to be replicated, it must be replicable. My first boss out of college gave me two pieces of advice that I continue to believe in: “Decide if you want to work to live, or live to work.” and “You are not promotable if you are irreplaceable.” Its important that YOU arent the sole reason for success, but its the mechanics of your business or your process.

3) Fail. Failure is important to remind you of the importance of success. So fail quickly. Then move just as quickly to erase that failure and replace it with success.

There is a corollary to these rules.

Dont be a miracle worker. Just be a doctor. Just be the best doctor you possibly can be. Its probably more than enough given you have either gotten a business off the ground, or hired to do a job.

Finally, success isnt hard. Its just hard work. Dont buy into the hype or the naysayers — you are probably not as good as some think, and better than others think.

Just keep on keeping on.