How Much is a Twitter Follower Worth?
$6.19
I know this because of the enormous research I did over the course of the previous 12 months based on multiple factors including number of followers, percent followed, age of account and 28 other measures.
$6.19
Of course, if you believe that, I have a bridge in Brooklyn you can buy.
For some reason, a intrinsic value has been placed on the number of friends or followers we have accumulated in social networks such as Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and others.
A week ago or so, I mischievously tweeted:
“base requirements for a SM expert: LI (>500); Twitter (>2000); FB (>1000); and at least 100 pics of you on flickr. (not self or mom taken)” - @micah
For many people, as their stature online grows they assume that their offline value also increases.
It seems that numbers equate to worth. RSS subscribers, pageviews, twitter followers, Facebook friends all equate to true value.
As an individual’s number of followers/friends grows, they become more aware of how people view them and begin to develop a “personal brand.” (”There are 10,000 people that read my tweets, I cant tweet a joke like that!”)
If a person has an intrinsic value online (meaning that they can influence behavior or thought online), should they also be aware of how they are valued and adhere to that?
Take for example Guy Kawasaki. Most of hs communication online (at least recently) is about Alltop (which is an information aggregator that includes this blog in the startups section), Truemors posts and other efforts he is involved in. How would people react if Guy started talking about just hockey? Would his following leave? Would he no longer have value online?
Or Robert Scoble. Robert is a great source for information about what he is doing and whats going on in the technology space. If he stopped talking about technology and started talking about nature, would his value subside?
Both do a great job of interacting with their respective communities, is that their real value?
Tim Ferriss and Lance Armstrong are both involved with Twitter and have a high number of followers, but neither follow anyone. Do they have no/limited value because of the lack of interaction?
As long as quantity drives online value, quality will always be seen as secondary, driving the voices of truly interesting people into the noise of the “valuable.”
Social Media Value should not be tied to number of followers or friends (or even previous recongnition or fame).
The value of any participant in any social system is just that: participation.

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=92d4c498-52c9-4ada-b76c-8a5d2d4084c4)

Add New Comment
Viewing 5 Comments
Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Add New Comment
Trackbacks
(Trackback URL)